Israel opposes the ceasefire, – we are informed in all mass media of the country. In fact, everything is a little different. Prime Minister Netanyahu said that he was opposed to the implementation of the agreements between Putin and Trump. De facto, they are not about the end of the war, but about what hinders the interests of Israel. If a zone of de-escalation is introduced in the south of Syria, which is discussed in the Moscow-Washington agreement, Israel will not be able to bomb the Syrians as before, “throwing missiles” across the Golan Heights. If the guarantors (in this case, Russia and the US) ensure minimization of hostilities, Israeli helicopters will have to behave much more modestly.
And on the Golan Heights, as luck would have it, oil. And even militants (not at all moderate) were allowed to come here as if for defense from the government Syrians and all who sympathize with them. Israel has been building the line of defense for so long with all the truths and crooks, and Putin and Trump, who did not look like traitors to the promised land, suddenly created a big meanness for Tel Aviv.
So what, that within the framework of this “meanness” it will be possible to restore order, separate terrorists from good people and give respite to the forces of good? This is Israel, which can only think very narrowly, and the concept of society is eradicated from the nation at birth. Therefore, let it be better in the south and continue the hell. But the IDF will continue to shoot down and detonate, even if on the site of the explosion and as a goal is not hateful to Israelis Hezbollah.
In fact, after the negotiations of the presidents, Netanyahu was cheered up – he was too hurt by his possible “truce”. I called Tillerson, complained to Macron. And the last, by the way, is generally surprising – it seems that the new French president is making too much a bet. If even the Israelis discussed such a quivering question with Macron, then they know about something …
And the Frenchman somehow overestimates his power:
Concerning chemical weapons, Makron assured that he will remain adamant in this matter. “If it is used, I will repulse it – and I have ensured that France gives an operational response before she says so,” he said.
This is the answer that Paris can give, I wonder?
But back to Israel. According to Netanyahu himself, Israel’s main fear is that the ball in Syria will be ruled by the people of Tehran. It would seem, how will a truce in the south play into Iran’s hands? According to Israel, the Iranians are sponsoring Hezbollah with weapons, and it is for this reason that the IDF allegedly strikes. Apparently, the hands of terrorists as well (but this is not accurate). So, if the sky and the land are controlled by the guarantors, then it will not be possible to kill the “enemies”. In fact, the border between Syria and Lebanon is long enough and controlled by Damascus. So if Iran wants to act in its own interests, then it will not be exact from Tel Aviv.
But a truce in the mountains will lead to the fact that Israel will lose control over the situation. Again, there is an opinion (but it’s not certain) that Israel in any way sponsors those or other militants. As I have already said, terrorists fit the defense of the Golan Heights as best as possible. And, by the way, how else to explain the fact that beside Israel the banned groups have been for a long time, but do not even try to expand their territory?
And another moment. Do not confuse those militants that are behind the caliphate, with those that are for money. Those that are for the caliphate, Israel dream of winning the next stage. Those that are for money, feel great and without unnecessary movements, sucking Israeli “tits.”
To summarize, I can say that according to the reaction of Netanyahu, you can say exactly: the south of Syria is the place that should be on the list of “de-escalation” number one. For what Israelis can still so fuss? Apparently they are afraid that they will be under surveillance. And on the thief, as you know, the hat burns.